Tagged: capital punishment

Errol Morris Strikes Again

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/07/opinion/errol-morris-interview-death-penalty.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-right-region&_r=0

In today’s New York Times, Errol Morris, famed author and moviemaker, addresses the death penalty.

 

Numbers Show Decline in the Use of the Death Penalty

Although three US states placed a death- penalty-related question on the ballot in the 2016 election, the overall statistics show another record decline in the imposition of the death penalty.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center’s The Death Penalty in 2016: Year End Report, “the death sentences, executions, and public support for death penalty [are] at historical lows.”

Death sentences peaked in 1996, with 315 death sentences imposed, while in 2016, about 30 death sentences were projected to be imposed as punishment. Looking at the numbers since 1973 (the year when states began re-enacting death penalty statutes), the average decline over the last 10 years is significant, showing more than a 50% decline.

The report also offers interesting facts about individual state practices, for example:

Four states that are responsible for 90% of the executions in the U.S. in 2016—Georgia (9), Texas (7), Florida (1), and Missouri (1)—have also carried out more than 85% of the country’s 83 executions over the past three years (Texas (27), Missouri (17), Georgia (16), and Florida (11)). 80% of all executions in the U.S. in 2016 took place in either Georgia or Texas.

Lastly, the report documents changes in public support for the death penalty, with a steady decline in support of the death penalty in favor of life without parole.

Related Readings:

New Perspectives on a Famous Literary Murder

BYProf. Peter Widulski, Assistant Director of the First Year Legal Skills Program and the Coach of International Criminal Moot Court Team at Pace Law School.

In 1942, while France was under World War II German occupation, a novel telling the story of a murder was published in Paris by the renowned Gallimard publishing house. The author was a Frenchman born and raised in Algeria (at the time annexed by France) who completed a first draft of the novel in 1940 while, at age 26, he was working in Paris. In the decades following the war, this novel would be published in sixty languages and attract considerable attention because of the stark and challenging questions it posed about human violence and criminal justice. Its original title was L’Étranger; its title in English would be The Stranger in American editions and The Outsider in British editions.

The author was Albert Camus. For L’Étranger and other writings, Camus would be awarded the 1957 Nobel Prize in Literature, in acknowledgment of “his important literary production, which with clear-sighted earnestness illuminates the problems of the human conscience in our times.”

The events in the novel take place in Algeria and are narrated by an Algerian Frenchman named Meursault. The novel begins with Meursault learning that his mother, with whom he appears to feel no close attachment, died in a home for the aged to which he committed her, and subsequently attending her funeral, during which he showed no outward signs of grief. Not long afterwards, Meursault fatally shoots a man – identified in the novel only as an “Arab” – who was armed with a knife and was involved in a quarrel earlier that day with one of Meursault’s acquaintances. When pressing for a capital murder conviction, the Prosecutor uses testimony he construes as showing Meursault’s lack of feeling for his mother to portray him to the jury as a heartless man who callously killed the victim. Narrating the course of his trial and its immediately preceding events, Meursault is laconic, focused primarily on the present, and apparently detached from any of the connections to family, religion, or culture that support human life. It is not until he is condemned to decapitation by guillotine that Meursault dispenses with previous pedestrian and random observations and, with relentless honesty, becomes seriously focused on his fate and his confrontation with death.

In a novel published in Algeria in 2013 – some seventy years after publication of L’Étranger – Kamel Daoud, an Algerian writer and journalist, creatively revisits the events portrayed in L’Étranger. Daoud’s novel is narrated, many years after the crime, by the brother of Meursault’s victim. The narrator provides the reader with an account of his brother’s life and personality and reflects on the effects his brother’s murder had on him, his family, and his community. Issues regarding colonialism in Algeria, which are present but at times below the surface in L’Étranger, come to the fore in Daoud’s novel. The book, which has been translated from French into English under the title The Meursault Investigation, has received several literary awards, including the 2015 Prix Goncourt du Premier Roman for a novel written in French as an author’s first novel.

Recently, Alice Kaplan, the John M. Musser Professor of French and chair of the Department of French at Yale University, published Looking for The Stranger: Albert Camus and the Life of a Literary Classic (University of Chicago Press 2016). The book provides a fascinating account of Camus’ life and work, including his early career as a newspaper reporter covering criminal trials in Algeria and his work as a writer for a French underground journal supporting resistance to the Nazi occupation. Kaplan details the complicated series of the events involved in getting L’Étranger published in occupied France and discusses the book’s reception in the post-war years. She also comments on the perspective Daoud takes in The Meursault Investigation.

Kaplan’s book, when read together with the novels of Camus and Daoud, provides the reader with insight into an important chapter in intellectual and literary history, and with searching consideration of several criminal justice issues, including prosecutorial manipulation of character evidence, cross-cultural violence, and capital punishment.

Reflections on a Criminal Justice Summer

It has been quite a summer. Having been involved in the criminal justice system for more than forty years, I feel as if there has never been a summer with so much going on – and so much attention being paid to it. Ferguson, Missouri, is the most recent and most alarming event, following so closely on the Staten Island chokehold case. These cases have focused serious attention on the police-citizen relationship that was front and center last year in the stop-and-frisk decision and the settlement of that lawsuit by the new New York City mayor.

We have been witness to the unprecedented actions of the Brooklyn, New York Conviction Integrity Unit in the District Attorney’s office, and to the dismissal of erroneous convictions in that county. These dismissals have been followed by substantial financial settlements by New York City. The New York Times ran a series of editorials urging the decriminalization of marijuana possession in some circumstances, and another editorial calling for revisions in the virtually-non-existent clemency process. Four state governors are either being tried, charged, or investigated.

Rampant prisoner abuse has been exposed just as claims made by prisoners has spiked, and there is now dialogue about the excessive use and destructive results of solitary confinement. The entire capital punishment process has come under scrutiny because the drug companies who provide the lethal drugs to accomplish our executions are no longer willing to do so. There is increasing focus on our entire system of punishment because of international attention on our disgracefully large prison population.

On an international level, we have also been witness to mass executions in Egypt and a long-awaited English investigation of the poisoning of a Russian journalist in London. Scotland abolished its long-standing and unique corroboration requirement. We were witness to an historic event:  a Black, South African, and female judge presiding at the trial of a young white male, who happened to be an internationally acclaimed athlete.

Having been raised on a September to September calendar, and having continued with that conception of the “year” as a law professor, I am pausing to wonder what we will witness in the next twelve months.

For now, the staff of the PCJI are taking a two-week break. We will resume our blog after Labor Day, on September 4.